Updated: May 3, 2018

Mesa Water District (Mesa Water®) supports:

1. Groundwater Quality Protection

a. Support Orange County Water District’s (OCWD) current groundwater quality protection programs

i. Basin Equity Assessment (BEA) Exemption Program for Impaired Groundwater (including the Mesa Water Reliability Facility)

ii. The MTBE, North Basin, and South Basin groundwater protection projects

iii. The Tustin and Irvine desalters

b. Encourage OCWD to protect the Basin from chlorides caused by seawater intrusion

i. Encourage OCWD to set a goal of maintaining protective elevations along the coast

ii. Encourage OCWD to hold semi-annual barrier meetings with Coastal Agencies (Huntington Beach, Mesa Water, and Seal Beach)

iii. Encourage semi-annual reporting on the barrier

2. Policies that raise and stabilize the Basin Pumping Percentage (BPP)

a. Support OCWD setting a target BPP that they intend to consistently meet

b. Support new water supply projects that help achieve this goal

c. Support OCWD adopting a water supply policy that sets a goal of developing water supply and recharge capabilities, including purchasing replenishment water, or other actions that result in a reliable and predictable source of groundwater at a BPP of 80 percent. A goal of this policy is to accomplish this with a cost-neutral, or better, impact on producers when the avoided cost of purchasing imported water is considered

3. Policies that keep the Basin full

a. Support OCWD adhering to the BPP-setting formula

b. Support maximum production at the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) to ensure a cost-effective, high-quality, environmentally-friendly and sustainable local water supply that benefits all OCWD producers and that increases the region’s current and future water reliability

c. Support maximum wastewater flows treatable by the GWRS to the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) -- and support OCSD/OCWD’s permanent acquisition of such wastewater flows -- to ensure source reliability for the GWRS

4. Basin Storage and Exchange Programs where the primary benefits accrue to OCWD, its Groundwater Producers, and the ratepayers they serve with such Programs applying the “Beneficiaries Pay” principle and addressing cost issues including, but not limited to:

a. Full cost recovery of a proportional share of the historic and future capital investments as well as operations and maintenance costs incurred by OCWD to manage the Basin

b. Full cost recovery of the proportional value that entry into the Basin affords, including the value of reliability (and thus loss of reliability to the Groundwater Producers through the loss of available storage capacity) and the value of treatment

c. Accounting for water loss in a current or future year (both lost out of the Basin and lost due to inability to spread or extract)

d. Consideration that the above is merely a “break even” deal, and any program should bring significant benefits in excess of the above to OCWD and its Groundwater Producers

e. Deferring entering into any agreements until the IRWD v. OCWD lawsuit is resolved

f. Deferring entering into any agreements until the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) Conjunctive Use Program has been terminated

g. Maximizing the beneficial use of the Basin while maximizing Basin Pumping Percentage (BPP) for the Groundwater Producers overlying the Basin

5. Annexations

a. Support financially neutral annexations into OCWD

6. A financially strong OCWD

a. Support policies and practices that maintain OCWD’s current AAA credit rating from two of the three credit rating agencies

7. The potential merger of the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) and OCWD if the merger:

a. is mutually agreed upon by both MWDOC and OCWD;

b. results in efficiencies and economic savings for the members of both agencies;

c. improves or, at a minimum, preserves the quality, reliability and sustainability of wholesale water services to the members of both agencies;

d. preserves the interests of groundwater producers currently existing within Orange County’s groundwater basin and protects those interests from diminished groundwater resources or supplies;

e. preserves the existing boundaries of the Orange County groundwater basin for pumping and storage purposes;

f. allows the Orange County groundwater basin to remain unadjudicated;

g. respects the “one person one vote” principle if the new Board of Directors is a wholly elected board;

h. is facilitated openly and transparently; and,

i. increases the effectiveness of Orange County’s representation at MWD, with a coordinated and unified voice representing Orange County

8. A strong independent MWDOC

a. Support MWDOC’s current mission and geographic boundaries, and oppose any efforts to break up the agency

b. Encourage MWDOC and OCWD exploring mutual areas of efficiency

c. Support any governance change agreed to by the MWDOC board

9. Increased influence at Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD)

a. Support increased allocations of MWDOC resources for engagement at MWD

b. Support coordination of the entire Orange County MWD delegation

10. MWDOC’s priority initiatives at MWD

a. Protect Mesa Water’s service area from any cost shifts as a result of the San Diego County Water Authority lawsuit

b. Encourage continued efforts in improving the Delta

c. Seek opportunities for MWD to provide assistance (or partnership) with MWDOC on developing desalination in Orange County

d. Continue to support MWD’s discounted replenishment water program

11. Close working relationships with MWDOC on local issues and programs for which the organization is advocating at MWD

12. The current Mesa Water Strategic Plan, including the District’s goals to:

a. Provide a safe, abundant, and reliable water supply.

b. Practice perpetual infrastructure renewal and improvement.

c. Be financially responsible and transparent.

d. Increase public awareness about Mesa Water and about water.

e. Attract and retain skilled employees.

f. Provide outstanding customer service.

g. Actively participate in regional water issues.

13. The development of cost-effective and environmentally sensitive sources of water, including recycling, groundwater clean-up, conservation, and desalination

14. The potential Huntington Beach Ocean Desalter project as it can possibly provide a new, reliable, quality water supply that is appropriately priced

15. The co-equal goals of improved water supply reliability and Delta ecosystem health

16. Water rates based on true costs in conformance with Prop. 218, and tax-free revenue

17. Policies that encourage economical and practical water efficiency for indoor water use, irrigation water use, and commercial and industrial water use, without stranding investments in potable reuse systems, including:

a. Indoor water use efficiency at the level needed for community health and safety -- as substantiated by a recently-commissioned, validated, and peer-reviewed end-use study -- and that protects local investments in potable reuse systems

b. Irrigation water use efficiency at the level necessary for productive crops and attractive landscapes

c. Commercial and industrial water use efficiency at a level that sustains economic vitality

18. Water use efficiency policies based on fact-based data and water use efficiency standards based on sound studies that are credible, replicable, and verifiable

19. Policies that establish regulatory and statutory parity for all types of recycled water, including purple pipe and potable reuse

20. Theft prevention of municipal metal infrastructure, such as fire hydrants, manhole covers, and backflow devices

Mesa Water opposes:

1. The encroachment of Mesa Water easements, rights-of-way, and property without negotiation, agreed upon compensation, and advance approval at the sole discretion of the District